Blog Archives

MITCH McCONNELL BRINGS HOME THE BACON

1/31/2020

CHICAGO (EJ) In a nearly party-line vote after a bitter debate, Democrats failed to win support from the four Republicans they needed. With Mr. Trump’s acquittal virtually certain, the president’s allies rallied to his defense, though some conceded he was guilty of the central allegations against him.
he Democrats’ push for more witnesses and documents failed 49 to 51, with only two Republicans, Mitt Romney of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine, joining Democrats in favor. A vote on the verdict is planned for Wednesday.
Even as they prepared to vote against removing him, several Republicans challenged Mr. Trump’s repeated assertions that he had done nothing wrong, saying they believed he had committed the main offense of which he was accused: withholding nearly $400 million in military aid to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and other Democrats.
Still, those Republicans said, they were unwilling to remove a president fewer than 10 months before he is to face voters.
“If you are persuaded that he did it, why do you need more witnesses?” said Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee, a critical swing vote on the issue whose late decision to oppose considering new evidence all but sealed Mr. Trump’s swift acquittal. “The country is not going to accept being told that they can’t elect the president they want to elect in the week the election starts by a majority for a merely inappropriate telephone call or action.”
“You don’t apply capital punishment for every offense,” Mr. Alexander added.
The vote signaled the end of a saga that has consumed Washington and threatened Mr. Trump’s hold on the presidency for the past five months, since the emergence in September of an anonymous whistle-blower complaint accusing him of using the levers of government to push Ukraine to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election.
Senators recessed the trial for the weekend and will return Monday for closing arguments, with a vote on the verdict on Wednesday.
Mitt Romney of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine are and should be remembered as traders

0 Comments

THE PRESIDENT WON THE IMPEACHMENT BATTLE BECAUSE HIS REPUBLICAN JEWISH LAWYERS WERE SMARTER THAN THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE JEWISH LAWYERS

1/31/2020

0 Comments

THE PRESIDENT WON THE IMPEACHMENT BATTLE BECAUSE HIS REPUBLICAN JEWISH LAWYERS WERE SMARTER THAN THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE JEWISH LAWYERS

Representative Adam B. Schiff was chosen to be the lead House manager of the impeachment trial after emerging as one of the most prominent Democrats spearheading the inquiry into Mr. Trump’s conduct.Adam Bennett Schiff (born June 22, 1960) is an American politician serving as the U.S. ... Edward and Sherrill Ann (Glovsky) Schiff. He was raised in a Jewish family which moved to Scottsdale, Arizona in 1970 and Alamo, California in 1972.
. As chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Representative Jerrold Nadler helped draft and approve the two articles of impeachment against Mr. Trump in December. Campaigning for the committee chairmanship in 2017, Mr. Nadler pitched himself as a lifelong fighter for civil rights and civil liberties as well as an expert in constitutional law who was the “strongest member to lead a potential impeachment.” Jerry Nadler was born into a Jewish family in Brooklyn, the son of Miriam (née Schreiber) and Emanuel "Max" Nadler
The law firms of Trump’s lead lawyer, Jay Sekulow, Jay Alan Sekulow is an American lawyer, radio and television talk show host, and politically ... A self-described Messianic Jew, Sekulow built a legal and media business over a thirty-year period by representing conservative, religious,
Attorney Jane Raskin Jamin Ben "Jamie" Raskin (born December 13, 1962) is an American author and politician ... Raskin was born in Washington, D.C. on December 13, 1962 to a Jewish family. He is the son of progressive activist Marcus Raskin--
The president’s legal team also includes celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz, was born in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on September 1, 1938, the son of Claire (née Ringel) and Harry Dershowitz,[11] an Orthodox Jewish couple. He was raised in Borough Park.[12] His father was a founder and president of the Young Israel Synagogue in the 1960s, served on the board of directors of the Etz Chaim School in Borough Park, and in retirement was co-owner of the Manhattan-based Merit Sales Company.[13] According to Dershowitz, Harry had a strong sense of justice and talked about how it was "the Jew's job to defend the underdog"
Kenneth W. Starr (born July 21, 1946) is an American lawyer who served as a United ... His classmates voted him most likely to succeed. In 1970, Starr married Alice Mendell, who was raised Jewish..

0 Comments

DERSHOWITZ DESTROYS THE DEMOCRATS PHONY IMPEACHMENT

1/30/2020

0 Comments

DERSHOWITZ MOUNTS UNCONVENTIONAL DEFENSE OF TRUMP AS SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL ENTERS NEW PHASE
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said he believes there are at least three Republicans who are seriously considering witnesses. “We need more,” he acknowledged Thursday.
GOP Sens. Mitt Romney of Utah, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are the three senators who have consistently signaled a willingness to join with Democrats.
"The fate of much of the future of how this republic conducts itself is on the shoulders of four Republicans," said Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
"A trial without truth, without key evidence, without witnesses and documents would render the president's acquittal meaningless," Schumer added. "A giant asterisk next to it, because the trial was so UNSUPPORTED BY ANY EVIDENCE."

0 Comments

JOHN BOLTON IS A LIAR WHO MITT ROMNEY WANTS TO EXPLOIT IN ORDER TO HURT TRUMP

1/28/2020

0 Comments

CHICAGO-(AEAE) Details that became public Sunday from Bolton’s unpublished book manuscript suggest that he could provide direct evidence that Trump sought to deny security assistance to Ukraine until Kyiv announced investigations into political opponents, including the Bidens. Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said Monday, repeatedly calling Bolton’s testimony “relevant.” “It’s important to be able to hear from John Bolton, for us to be able to make an impartial judgment.”
It is obvious from the record that both John Bolton and his landsman, Mitt Romney are trying desperately to keep their names in the headlines by whatever means possible.
Last week, Trump’s attorneys had to sit quietly and watch while the House Democratic managers delivered their arguments, but Monday the roles were reversed and the seven House managers sat quietly looking on as one member of Trump’s defense team after another rose to address different aspects of the proceedings.
The first Trump lawyer to speak at length was Kenneth Starr, the former independent counsel whose expansive investigation of Bill Clinton led to Clinton’s impeachment by the House in 1998 and subsequent acquittal by the Senate. Starr talked about the constitutional basis for the impeachment process, contending that it is at risk of being abused unless today’s Senate acts to stop it.

0 Comments

Trump impeachment is a 'hoax'

1/19/2020

0 Comments

Chicago (EJ) Trump slammed his impeachment as a hoax that distracted attention from two of the biggest trade deals in the history of the country that were reached this week. He signed a deal with China on Wednesday and the Senate gave final approval Thursday to a trade deal with Canada and Mexico.
A two-thirds majority of the Senate would be required to convict and remove Trump, which is unlikely in the chamber where Republicans outnumber Democrats 53 to 47.
The articles accuse Trump of pressuring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Biden while withholding a valuable White House meeting and $391 million in military aid.
Trump and his Republican defenders said he has the authority to conduct foreign policy and sought was justified in seeking to fight corruption in Ukraine. Republicans noted that Zelensky never announced an investigation, but Trump met with him and released the aid anyway.
“They have a hoax going on over there. Let’s take care of it," Trump told congressional Republicans who attended a White House ceremony Wednesday announcing a China trade agreement.

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL
Read the trial memo from House managers and the response from President Trump’s legal team.

0 Comments

Iran shot down Ukrainian airliner kiling 138 Passingers

1/9/2020

0 Comments

l
Chicago-(EJ) European Security Officials said that Iran shot down a Ukrainian airliner on Wednesday, based on continuing analysis of data from satellites, radar and electronic data collected routinely by military and intelligence sources.
President Donald Trump on Thursday said he suspected the crash was caused by the Iranians
European security officials told CNN that the plane was shot down by an Iranian surface to air missile in retaliation for the killing of its top general in Iraq.
The timing of the crash , coming just hours after Iran fired missiles at two Iraqi bases housing US troops. The exchange of attacks between Tehran and Washington on Iraqi soil was a dramatic escalation of tensions between the adversaries, and is raising fears of another proxy war in the Middle Ea
The head of Iran's Civil Aviation Authority has refused to deny the allegations.
Ali Abedzadeh said, "There is no question that a rocket or missile hit the plane, the only question is whether the Americans are behind this attack?”
Abedzadeh said that “he believed that the the great Satan, American, shot down the plane and are now trying to blame Iran. He said,”Americans are behind all of the evil in the world, they are the great “Satan,” I am glade my relatives were not on that plane.”
Newsweek was first to report US and Iraqi sources reporting that Iran shot down the plane.
The Ukrainian International Airlines (UIA) flight PS752 came down just minutes after takeoff from Tehran on Wednesday local time, killing all 176 people on board, including dozens of Iranians and Canadians. The Boeing 737-800 was headed for Kiev, where 138 passengers were expected to take a connecting flight to Canada. Ukrainians, Swedes, Afghans, Germans and British nationals were also aboard.
Boeing was relieved to hear that a missile hit their 737 plane killing 138 people, and that it was not a "soft ware," problem that brought down the plane.
Joe Biden said,"I never had a problem with the Iranians, If they get the bomb, they will not use it on Israel or the U.S" Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders both agreed with Biden.

0 Comments

TIME FOR THE BAN ON FELONS RIGHTS TO POSSESS HANDGUNS TO BE LIFTED

1/7/2020

0 Comments

Chicago (EJ) Leo Stoller 73’ a disabled person, a protected person, as defined by the Americans for Disability Act (ADA) respectfully petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court today for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decision refusing to allow felons to possess fire arms

At Issue: Stoller case involves a Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the federal law prohibiting gun ownership by first time offenders, people convicted of non violent felonies A majority of Third Circuit judges, sitting en banc, agreed that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to Daniel Binderup (who was convicted of corrupting a minor), and Julio Suarez (who was convicted of carrying an unlicensed handgun. Stoller argues that the Third Circuit decision on sustain the right for convicted criminals to retain Second Amendment Rights to possess fire Arms, should be the law in every Federal Circuit.
Stoller argues that The Supreme Court’s intervention is necessary because there is a division in the federal appellate courts on the permissibility of as-applied challenges to § 922(g)(1).
Stoller’s brief explains that the recent Third Circuit’s ruling invalidates § 922(g)(1) in many of its applications, and is in conflict with the other circuits.

Stoller argues the U.S. Supreme Court should must accept the Petitioner’s Writ of Cert to clarify that the Third Circuit’s ruling that invalidates § 922(g)(1) in many of its applications, and will not allow dangerous felons to acquire firearms, contravening Congress’s intent to prohibit all criminals who committed crimes with at least the specified maximum sentence from acquiring firearms and does not create administrative burdens that undermine the efficacy of § 922(g)(1). and will not allow dangerous felons to acquire firearms, contravening Congress’s intent to prohibit all criminals who committed crimes with at least the specified maximum sentence from acquiring firearms. We also argue that the Third Circuit’s decision will not create administrative burdens that undermine the efficacy of § 922(g)(1). On the other hand if the Third Circuit’s decision becomes the law of the land it will.

Stoller argues that the U.S. Supreme Cour must Declare that the felon-in-possession ban of 18 USC § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to non violent, first time offenders. See a copy of his Supreme Court Brief which was filed today.

writ_of__certiorari_01-06-20.pdf
File Size:	1028 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

0 Comments

Click to set custom HTML

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY (EJP)

supports moral and ethical causes. Strongly advocates Equal Justice for all.
The purpose of the Equal Justice Party is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on unethical attorneys, judges, judicial misconduct issues, unfit government officials, unfit professionals, professors, doctors. EJP studies, evolving intellectual property and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail, especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. The Equal Justice Party advocates adherence to the Law, relies on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as its authority.

Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the Equal Justice Party (EJP) website is intended to provide general information about the Equal Justice Party and an opportunity for interested persons to contact EJP. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. EJP is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of EJP services. While EJP endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, EJP makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. (c) 2018 EJP All Rights Reserved. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

RSS Feed