Blog Archives

MUELLER FRAMES COHEN TO GET TRUMP

12/20/2018

CHICAGO-(EJ) MUELLER FRAMES COHEN TO GET TRUMP; Michael Cohen, formerly an attorney for President Donald Trump, pleaded guilty on Aug. 21 to campaign finance charges that are not crimes, according to former Federal Elections Commission chair Bradley Smith.
Cohen pleaded guilty to eight charges in a Manhattan court to charges of tax evasion, making false statements to banks, and campaign finance violations. The campaign finance charges are related to a $130,000 payment Cohen made in exchange for the silence of a woman who claims to have had an affair with Trump more than a decade ago. The prosecutors allege that the payment constitutes a campaign contribution and thus violates the law because it exceeds the individual contribution limit and was made using a corporation.
In charging Cohen, the prosecutors cited a broad legal definition of what constitutes a campaign contribution but failed to mention a specific prohibition on the personal use of campaign funds, which disqualifies the payment as a contribution. Cohen did not commit any crimes, he was just hoodwinked into pleading guilty to crimes he did not commit.
.

0 Comments

THE SECOND AMENDMENT TAKES A HIT AGAIN IN NEW JERSEY

12/7/2018

0 Comments

CHICAGO- AEAE- December 5, 2018. In a 2-1 decision, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit refused to stop the enforcement of New Jersey’s 10-round magazine ban.
The majority, in an opinion by Judge Patty Shwartz and joined by a black Judge Joseph Greenaway, both liberal, un qualified judges that have been appointed by President Obama, erroneously held that the ban did not violate the Second Amendment because it reasonably advanced the State’s interest in reducing mass shootings without severely burdening the rights of law-abiding citizens.A decision that made no legal sense whatsoever.
On the other hand Judge Stephanos Bibas, appointed by President Trump, authored the correct decision in a forceful dissent, pointing out that the majority refused to apply standard constitutional principles to the case and instead treated the Second Amendment differently than any other constitutional right. Judge Bibas was right on the law and the facts.
Judge Bibas observed: “The Second Amendment is an equal part of the Bill of Rights. We must treat the right to keep and bear arms like other enumerated rights, as the Supreme Court insisted in [District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)].”
He rejected what he termed the majority’s “watered down“ approach to the Second Amendment and is heralded by gun rights activits .
Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/12/third-circuit-tells-gun-owners-turn-in-gun-magazines/#ixzz5Z1E8Kn30
Chief Justice John Roberts was wrong when he stated that "there are no Obama judges and no Clinton judges. There are many "unfit" Obama judges unfortunately on the bench today, who were appointed by what authorities now claim is the "worst" president in American history, Barack Obama according to Professor Harold Goldenshalf.
Justice Stephanos Bibas shown below.

0 Comments

Double jeopardy an Illusion in the U.S. to be heard by High Court

12/6/2018

0 Comments

CHICAGO — The U.S. Supreme Court hears a challenge Thursday to its long-standing rule that putting someone on trial more than once for the same crime does not violate the Constitution's protection against jeopardy.double
The Fifth Amendment says no person shall be "twice put in jeopardy of life or limb" for the same offense, and most Americans are familiar with the term double jeopardy. But for more than 160 years, the Supreme Court has ruled that being prosecuted once by a state and again in federal court, or the other way around, for the same crime doesn't violate the provision because the states and the federal government are "separate sovereigns."

0 Comments

REMEMBERING GEORGE BUSH

12/5/2018

0 Comments

CHICAGO-AEAE- Remembering President George H.W. Bush, who was a war hero.
On November 19, 1980, President-elect Ronald Reagan and Vice President-elect George H.W. Bush paid a courtesy visit to the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger met with Reagan and Bush in the Justices’ Conference Room where both men signed the Court’s guest book. Afterwards, the three men went upstairs to the Justices’ Dining Room where they were met by the other members of the Court. The visit concluded with Chief Justice Burger escorting Reagan and Bush through the Great Hall and down the front steps of the Supreme Court Building.
George Bush will always be remembered for saying "No new taxes" when he was running for election in 1988. Then he raised the taxes.
George Bush a Republican, came out publicly against the Republican Donald Trump, said "He was unfit for office" and voted for Hiliary Clinton.
When Bush lay dying, his son George W. Bush was not present, it is reported that he was at a golf outing, but was able to speak to his father through a "speaker" phone, telling him that his family loved him and will miss him".
Bush Senior was rated the 17 most popular president. Obama is rated the near the worst president.
Donald Trump currently is rated as performing the job of the president as one of the best, despite his obvious character flaws.

here to edit.

0 Comments

Click to set custom HTML

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY (EJP)

supports moral and ethical causes. Strongly advocates Equal Justice for all.
The purpose of the Equal Justice Party is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on unethical attorneys, judges, judicial misconduct issues, unfit government officials, unfit professionals, professors, doctors. EJP studies, evolving intellectual property and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail, especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. The Equal Justice Party advocates adherence to the Law, relies on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as its authority.

Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the Equal Justice Party (EJP) website is intended to provide general information about the Equal Justice Party and an opportunity for interested persons to contact EJP. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. EJP is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of EJP services. While EJP endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, EJP makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. (c) 2018 EJP All Rights Reserved. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

RSS Feed