EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
  • EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY

TIME FOR THE BAN ON FELONS  RIGHTS TO POSSESS HANDGUNS TO BE LIFTED

1/7/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture






​Chicago (EJ) Leo Stoller 73’ a disabled person, a protected person, as defined by the Americans for Disability Act (ADA) respectfully petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court today  for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment  of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decision refusing to allow felons to possess fire arms
 
At Issue:  Stoller case involves a Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the federal law prohibiting gun ownership by first time offenders, people convicted of non violent felonies A majority of Third Circuit judges, sitting en banc, agreed that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to Daniel Binderup (who was convicted of corrupting a minor), and Julio Suarez (who was convicted of carrying an unlicensed handgun. Stoller argues that the Third Circuit decision on sustain the right for convicted criminals to retain Second Amendment Rights to possess fire Arms, should be the law in every Federal Circuit.
Stoller argues that The Supreme Court’s intervention is necessary because there is a division in the federal appellate courts on the permissibility of as-applied challenges to § 922(g)(1).
Stoller’s  brief explains that the recent Third Circuit’s ruling invalidates § 922(g)(1) in many of its applications, and is in conflict with the other circuits.
 
Stoller argues the U.S. Supreme Court should must accept the Petitioner’s Writ of Cert to clarify that the Third Circuit’s ruling   that invalidates § 922(g)(1) in many of its applications, and will not allow dangerous felons to acquire firearms, contravening Congress’s intent to prohibit all criminals who committed crimes with at least the specified maximum sentence from acquiring firearms and does not create administrative burdens that undermine the efficacy of § 922(g)(1).   and will not allow dangerous felons to acquire firearms, contravening Congress’s intent to prohibit all criminals who committed crimes with at least the specified maximum sentence from acquiring firearms. We also argue that the Third Circuit’s decision  will not create administrative burdens that undermine the efficacy of § 922(g)(1).  On the other hand if the Third Circuit’s decision  becomes the law of the land it will.
 
Stoller argues that the U.S. Supreme Cour must Declare that the felon-in-possession ban of 18 USC § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to  non violent, first time offenders. See a copy of his Supreme Court Brief which was filed today.

​



writ_of__certiorari_01-06-20.pdf
File Size: 1028 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Click to set custom HTML

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY (EJP)

    supports moral and ethical causes. Strongly advocates Equal Justice for all.
    The purpose of the Equal Justice Party is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on unethical attorneys, judges, judicial misconduct issues, unfit government officials,   unfit professionals, professors, doctors. EJP studies, evolving intellectual property   and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail, especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. The Equal Justice Party advocates adherence to the Law, relies on the Constitution  and the Bill of Rights as its authority.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    August 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    January 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    July 2013
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012


    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the Equal Justice Party (EJP)  website is intended to provide general information about the Equal Justice Party and an opportunity for interested persons to contact EJP. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  EJP is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of EJP services. While EJP endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, EJP makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. (c) 2018 EJP All Rights Reserved. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from kennethkonica