TODAY THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL was charged with Professional Misconduct in a Civil Case in DuPage County Illinois Case No.2020 MROOO349

6/8/2020

CHICAGO-TODAY THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL was charged with Professional Misconduct in a Civil Case in DuPage County Illinois Case No.2020 MROOO349 where Mr. Kwame Raoul office is attempting to block a disabled white adult child from receiving 6 more hours of home care during the Covid 19 pendemic .
Kwame Raoul the Illinois Attorney General having direct supervisory authority over Mr. Brian Jant, an assistant Illinois Attorney General is charged with failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that Mr. Brian Jant conforms to the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. Instead. Kwame Raoul is charged with using Brian Jant, as a shield, to protect himself from charges of professional misconduct, associated with case No 2020 MROOO349 by directing Brian Jant to file frivolous pleading in this case to block a disabled adult child from receiving 6 additional hours of home health cared during the pendemic.
(c) Kwame Raoul is responsible for the charges of Brian Jant violation(s) of the Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3(a) and 8.4(c) & (d) before the DuPage County Court. because Kawame Raoul is charged with : (1)ordering Brian Jant, with knowledge of the specific professional misconduct, ratifies the specific professional misconduct involved; and (2) Kwame Raoul is the Illinois Attorney General with managerial authority (ARDC Rule 5.1 violation) in the AG"s office which Brian Jant practices, and has direct supervisory authority over Brian Jant and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but is charged with failing to take reasonable remedial action by endorsing and re defying the professional misconduct conduct before the Dupage County court in filing fraudulent Motion(s).
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Kwame Raoul and Brian Jant deny the charges and are considered innocent of all charges of professional misconduct and fraud until proven guilty before a court of law.

motion_for_rule_137_sanctions_.pdf
File Size:	884 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

memorandum_in_support_of_michael_stoller_motion_for_rule_137_sanctions.pdf
File Size:	9956 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

email_6-7-20_service_of_memorandum.pdf
File Size:	153 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

email_brian_-_stoller_v._idhs__2020_mr_000349.pdf
File Size:	88 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

0 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY (EJP)

supports moral and ethical causes. Strongly advocates Equal Justice for all.
The purpose of the Equal Justice Party is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on unethical attorneys, judges, judicial misconduct issues, unfit government officials, unfit professionals, professors, doctors. EJP studies, evolving intellectual property and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail, especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. The Equal Justice Party advocates adherence to the Law, relies on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as its authority.

Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the Equal Justice Party (EJP) website is intended to provide general information about the Equal Justice Party and an opportunity for interested persons to contact EJP. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. EJP is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of EJP services. While EJP endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, EJP makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. (c) 2018 EJP All Rights Reserved. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

RSS Feed