EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
  • EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY

KENT A. BOWERSOCK LAWYER FOR NISSAN NORTH AMERICA,  CHARGED WITH A  ATTORNEY DISBARMENT COMPLAINT BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AMERICANS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS BEFORE THE TEXAS BAR

11/16/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
Picture

CHICAGO (AEAE)-KENT  A. BOWERSOCK THE  LAWYER FOR NISSAN NORTH AMERICA  WAS CHARGED BY a representative of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics(AEAE) a Chicago based attorney ethics watch dog group, since 1974,  with an Attorney Disbarment complaint, after Kent A. Bowersock refused to have his attorney contact AEAE. A representative of AEAE filed with the Texas Bar Association, an allegation that Mr. Bowersock engaged in professional misconduct and subornation of perjury stemming from a Chicago Arbitration proceeding, presided over by Arbitrator Allen Goldberg,  in which Highland Park Motor Company  was charged with a “bait and switch” false and deceptive advertising scheme, promoting a Nissan Sentra Car lease, which Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (NMAC) was involved with.
The mission of the State Bar of Texas is to support the administration of the legal system, assure all citizens equal access to justice, foster high standards of ethical conduct for lawyers.
 
Christian A. Sullivan,  a partner with the law firm of Swanson Martin Bell, represented NMAC in the arbitration and now is a defendant in a recently filed DuPage County multi  million dollar lawsuit.

Christian  A. Sullivan is currently attempting to dodge service of process of that lawsuit, although he had previously agreed to accept service on behalf of himself and NMAC. They will be defaulted shortly.

Kent A. Bowersock graduated from the law school of Texas Tech University, in Dallas Texas in 2010 and according to the recently filed Texas Attorney Disbarment Complaint has brought the Texas Tech University Law School into disrepute as well as Nisssan North America, Inc., and its officers, directors, Roland Kruger, Mark Kaczynski, Nobao Araki, Hiroto Saikwa (Nissan CEO)  and Carlos Ghosn.

The President of Highland Park Motor Company Mark Muller, was charged with perjury in a related lawsuit filed in DuPage County Illinois  Case No. 2017 L 001177. A spokesman for  Muller  said  “he denies the charges”.
 
Muller’s attorney,  Ira M. Levin,  a partner with the Chicago law firm of Burke Warren MacKay & Serritella, was charged in an Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Complaint (ARDC) filed by a representative of AEAE, with subornation of perjury and other violations of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct 3.3(a), 8.4 (c) &(d).  Ira M. Levin denies all charges of wrong doing.
Currently Kent A. Bowersock , Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Highland Park Motor Company, Mark Muller, their attorney Ira Levin,  are defendants in a DuPage County, Illinois lawsuit Case No. 2017L 001177 and all of them are attempting to “dodge” service of process even though Kent A. Bowersock had agreed to accept service of process according to an unnamed source for Nissan North America and himself.

Kent A. Bowersock declined to comment. His office said, that Mr. Bowersock does not care to discuss matters that are involved in litigation. Ira Levin’s office,  also refused to comment. An unnamed source at  Christian Sullivan  law firm said, “that Christian is not guilty of subornation of perjury.”

Legal Disclaimer: Attorney Kent  A. Bowersock, Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Attorney Ira  M. Levin,  Burke Warren MacKay & Serritella, Mark Muller, Highland Park Motor Company, attorney Christian A. Sullivan, Swanson, Martin & Roland Kruger, Mark Kaczynski, Nobao Araki, Hiroto Saikwa (Nissan CEO) and Carlos Ghosn. denies all the charges against them and are considered innocent  until proven guilty in a court of law.

Picture
Picture
1 Comment
Michigan No Fault Car Accident Attorney link
11/30/2018 01:47:52 pm

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Click to set custom HTML

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY (EJP)

    supports moral and ethical causes. Strongly advocates Equal Justice for all.
    The purpose of the Equal Justice Party is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on unethical attorneys, judges, judicial misconduct issues, unfit government officials,   unfit professionals, professors, doctors. EJP studies, evolving intellectual property   and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail, especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. The Equal Justice Party advocates adherence to the Law, relies on the Constitution  and the Bill of Rights as its authority.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    August 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    January 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    July 2013
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012


    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the Equal Justice Party (EJP)  website is intended to provide general information about the Equal Justice Party and an opportunity for interested persons to contact EJP. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  EJP is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of EJP services. While EJP endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, EJP makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. (c) 2018 EJP All Rights Reserved. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from kennethkonica