EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
  • EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY

Biden Misleads the Public  Regarding the Collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank and the SVB Signature Bank

3/13/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
​WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 13:2023: U.S. President Joe Biden speaks about the banking system in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 13, 2023 in Washington, DC. President Biden gave a misleading update regarding the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in California and how his administration is handling the ripple effects.
“Why do All politicians lie. Why does the President of the United States lie the most?
The record shows”  according to Professor Harold Goldenshalf “ is the biggest liar of them all”. Biden falsely stated ::

"Americans can have confidence that the banking system is safe,” Biden said at the White House before heading out to California for a meeting with foreign leaders and a political fundraiser.

“The American banking system is anything but safe” according to Goldenshalf..
“Your deposits will be there when you need them,” Biden said, referring to customers who had deposits in Silicon Valley Bank, which collapsed last week. People who had deposits in SVB and Signature Bank in New York, which failed over the weekend, will be guaranteed their money back, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced over the weekend.
The same protections will not extend to the executives who ran the bank and the financiers who invested in the bank, Biden said.

"The people running the bank should not work there anymore,” Biden said. As for the investors in the failed bank, they're out of luck and out of their investments, he said.
“They knowingly took a risk” Biden said. “And when the risk didn’t pay off, investors lose their money. That’s how capitalism works.”
​
And the money used to ensure depositors are made whole will come from an FDIC account paid for through bank fees, Biden noted.
Two banks failed. The FIDA covers deposits up to $250,000. “For Biden to give the the  Depositor’s any more than the $250,000 for their loses after the banks failed is a travesty” Goldenshalf said, .
The failure of the Banks should have costs the Depositors everything over $250,000 which was insured. According to Goldenshalf,
"No losses will be borne by the taxpayers," Biden said. “The money to protect depositors was a gift from the White House right out of the pockets of the American people, a gift to the rich.” According to Goldenshalf..
“There is not sufficient funds from the  Banks fees paid to insure deposits to cover the loses of the two banks so the tax payers will have to be grouched to accommodate the rich”,  according to Professor Harold Goldenshalf.
Picture

Following the closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank this week by regulators aiming to prevent financial collapse, Senator Elizabeth Warren is arguing executives should face legal and monetary consequences for their role in the looming banking crisis.
The banks, Warren argued in an op-ed for The New York Times, "suffered from a toxic mix of risky management and weak supervision," allowing executives to take advantage of Trump-era rollbacks in banking regulations to the detriment of depositors who trusted the institution's stability.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Click to set custom HTML

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY (EJP)

    supports moral and ethical causes. Strongly advocates Equal Justice for all.
    The purpose of the Equal Justice Party is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on unethical attorneys, judges, judicial misconduct issues, unfit government officials,   unfit professionals, professors, doctors. EJP studies, evolving intellectual property   and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail, especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. The Equal Justice Party advocates adherence to the Law, relies on the Constitution  and the Bill of Rights as its authority.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    August 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    January 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    July 2013
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012


    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the Equal Justice Party (EJP)  website is intended to provide general information about the Equal Justice Party and an opportunity for interested persons to contact EJP. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  EJP is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of EJP services. While EJP endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, EJP makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. (c) 2018 EJP All Rights Reserved. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from kennethkonica